Sign up for free Newsletters

Once a month get new photos and expert tips.

Sign Up

National Geographic's Green Guide




Tips for Everyday Green Living

Nov 20

Sustainable Eating This Thanksgiving

Posted on November 20, 2009 | 0 Comments

turkey-125.jpgIf you are looking for a few green tips this holiday season, check out Green Guide writer Eliza Barclay's new story on returning to green and grateful this Thanksgiving.

We often hear that going vegetarian is the single best thing you can do to help the environment. Well, it may be true. But if you can't give up meat, and the traditional Thanksgiving bird, try a heritage breed turkey. Even though they are still domesticated livestock, heritage breeds help increase biodiversity, and are a good alternative to homogeneous and antibiotic-filled factory-farm birds. And chances are you can find one from a relatively local farmer, which will help you cut down on your food miles and the associated carbon emissions.

Find a local breeder using Local Harvest's Web site.

For more on environmentally friendly farm practices, visit National Geographic's sustainable agriculture Web site.

and if you're traveling this Thanksgiving, check out Barclay's tips for fuel-efficient driving.

--Tasha Eichenseher blog-headshot.jpg

Nov 19

It's World Toilet Day--Yes, That's Right

Posted on November 19, 2009 | 0 Comments

bigsquat_100x100.gifChances are you have a toilet that is easily accessible and fully functional. Thank your lucky stars, because 2.5 billion people around the globe don't, according to experts on such things.

November 19 was designated World Toilet Day by the World Toilet Organization (WTO) to bring awareness to a lack of sanitation service, and its associated disease and death. According to WTO, poor sanitation kills 1.8 million people a year--mostly children and primarily through diarrheal diseases.

While the issue may not directly affect you, some of your tax dollars do go to mend global problems with access to water, sanitation, and hygiene. In 2005 President George W. Bush signed into law the Senator Paul Simon Water for the Poor Act, which makes water, sanitation, and hygiene a strategic focus for U.S. foreign aid. In fiscal year 2008-2009, Congress earmarked $300 million to support these projects.

In general Americans seem to support this use of funds, with 61 percent of a recent survey group putting improved access to safe drinking water at the top of a list of issues we believe should be global health priorities for the U.S., according to a Center for Strategic & International Studies September 2009 report on "Enhancing U.S. Leadership on Drinking Water and Sanitation."

What do you do if you don't have a toilet? Many people have no choice but to use the great outdoors, or a nearby ditch or alley.

In October, potty and public health guru Rose George blogged for Huffington Post on "How to Save the World With Sanitation," describing the situation in Mozambique, where nearly 80 percent of villages resort to open defecation. It is a similar situation in many other developing countries.

George, interviewed by National Geographic in March, said the situation is undignified and dangerous, especially for women, who risk rape and snakebite. The resulting water pollution and fecal contamination also carry an enormous health risk, particularly for children, George added.

Watch National Geographic's video interview with Rose George.

Experts, such as George, say the solution may sit with programs such as Community-Led Total Sanitation, which aims to reform perception and behavior in an entire village. "There's little point in 90 percent of villagers having a latrine when the other ten percent are still tramping shit back into the living environment," George writes for the Huffington Post. Other nonprofits, development organizations, and entrepreneurs have had success marketing toilet use as sexy and financially lucrative.

--Tasha Eichenseher blog-headshot.jpg

Nov 13

Q&A: NHL's Matt Bradley on Playing for Team Earth

Posted on November 13, 2009 | 0 Comments

matt-2.jpg

With Earth skating on thin ice due to climate change, some hockey players in the U.S. are taking steps to reduce waste and carbon dioxide emissions.

Matt Bradley (left), a right-winger for the Washington Capitals in Washington, D.C., has encouraged his teammates to recycle and drink from reusable bottles. He's also taken part in the National Hockey League Players' Association's Carbon Neutral Challenge, which offset more than 4,200 tons of carbon emissions in the 2009 season. (Read: "Do Carbon Offsets Do More Damage Than Good?")

Some sports stadiums, including hockey rinks, are also greening their playing fields by adopting LEED certification, a third-party verification of their green building operations and performance.

Green Guide spoke with Bradley about his environmental leadership.

Can you summarize what your actions have been so far?
As far as what I've done with our team, a couple years ago I noticed there was no recycling of our [plastic] water bottles and Gatorade bottles. So I just suggested we get some bins, and instead of throwing them away just start recycling them. The next step last year with the team was we bought reusable bottles, and [we're] trying to cut down on using [bottled water] and [are] instead using filtered water in our room.

Has the team been using [the reusable bottles]?
Not everyone is, but most of the guys are. And same with the recycling, the players and staff have really come on board and done a great job.

What inspired this?
About five to six years ago I may not have been thinking as much about living a green life, and my wife Sasha has been a big influence on that. I have a cottage back home on the lake and I've noticed changes over the last little while [that are] not for the better. [For instance], there has been more algae in the water lately and not as much snow in the winter. It's something that is now very important to me and my wife and stuff that I think everyone can do.

How have you gotten involved with the NHLPA Carbon Neutral Challenge?
I was involved with our team as far as getting our guys on board with it. Basically what it is is we buy back our carbon output ... Obviously we fly everywhere and we have a pretty big carbon footprint, [so we] offset our stuff with wind energy and other things like that. In our association we have 770 players and [somewhere in the] mid-700s signed up for it. It was a real successful thing.

Leading the sustainable lifestyle isn't that easy all the time. Can you say what sacrifices you've made that have been tougher than just recycling?
Most of the stuff we do is not that hard. My wife and I are hoping in the next little while to build our house back home as close to off-the-grid as we can, and even that isn't a hard thing to do. It's a choice you have to make. To me a lot of it is choices, and it's not a big inconvenience a lot of the time to make the right choice.

I ask that because there's a lot of greenwashing out there.
That's true, and I think a lot of companies throw green around to sell products and often I wonder if it's just a marketing ploy or if they do care ... There's a big difference between saying you're going to do stuff and actually doing it.

What has been the response from your fans?
The team has done a good job publicizing what we're doing and [it will] hopefully have a trickle effect. They've had emails about people starting their own recycling programs, and I've been to some schools talking about green living.

Why has hockey gotten attention for having an environmental ethic? Why not other sports?
A lot of us are from more rural towns and cities and maybe we're closer to nature back home. We can maybe see the changes that have been more apparent to us than people living in the city.

Do you continue to find ways to make your life more sustainable?
Yes. The biggest thing you do is to make wherever you live as green as possible. I think with everyday that goes by there [are] new things you can learn or do or new choices you have to reduce your footprint.

I imagine you've probably heard there's a climate change meeting coming up next month in Copenhagen. Do you hope there's going to be some legislation that comes out of that that would reduce emissions?
Yeah, I understand the machine is tough to change, but you can argue that everyone has to live on our planet, this isn't something that only affects certain people. ... In the end I think we all have a responsibility to do the right thing. I know change is tough sometimes on a large scale but hopefully morality wins out in the end.

--Christine Dell'Amore

Note: This Q&A has been edited for length.

Related:

--How to go on a carbon diet.

--Test your global warming IQ.

Photograph courtesy Melissa Molyneux

Along with teleporting technology, electronic eyes, and HIV immunization, a handful of green innovations that could change the way we eat, heat, and drive made Time magazine's 2009 list of best inventions, released today.

Coming in at number two: Tank-bred southern bluefin tuna that successfully spawned in Port Lincoln, Australia. Southern bluefin, sought after for sushi and sashimi, have been dangerously overfished. A tank harvest could relieve pressure on threatened wild populations of the species, which has declined by nearly 90 percent since population estimates were first made decades ago.

Read more about how to find sustainable fish.

Making the list at number 13 is the Powerhouse Solar Shingle, produced by Dow Chemical Co. The shingles serve as roofing and solar panels that are expected to cost up to 15 percent less than traditional solar roof installations.

Learn more about other innovative solar technologies.

Time's number 36 is meat farming, the promise of which is brought to us by Dutch scientists who are coming close to growing muscle (meat) from pig stem cells.

And some of Time's picks had legs before 2009, but are worth mentioning for the amount of energy and money they can save:

Number 3: A new LED bulb by Philips Electronics that uses fewer than 10 watts and lasts for 25,000 hours.

Number 4: The EnergyHub Dashboard smart thermostat, which tells you how much power individual appliances are sucking up and how big of a dent they're putting in your wallet.

Number 12: The personal carbon footprint, so you know how much of a contribution you and your appliances are making to global warming.

Number 16: Vertical farming, or growing produce in stacked planting beds. See pictures of vertical farms.

Number 25: The Nissan Leaf--what manufacturers and some experts are calling the first electric car for the masses. Production is scheduled to start in the fall of 2010.

Number 31: "The Living Wall," an eight-story botanical installation with nearly 260 species on the exterior of London's Athenaeum Hotel. Using plants to cover exterior walls has been known to help reduce heating and cooling costs.

And Number 34: The human-powered vending machine.

--Tasha Eichenseher
blog-headshot.jpg

Endocrine disruptors. They are the chemicals often found in pesticides and plasticizers (and detergents, food, toys, and cosmetics) that have been known to interfere with reproductive and immune function in both humans and wildlife.

And now a new report highlights their prevalence in the Potomac River system--the primary source of drinking water for the Washington, D.C. metro area.

The report, released today by the Potomac Conservancy, highlights the increased number of intersex fish--male fish that have developed eggs--in the Potomac River watershed.

This peculiar and somewhat terrifying condition has been linked to increased amounts of endocrine disruptors flowing into rivers. The chemical compounds find their way downstream through pharmaceuticals flushed down the toilet, personal care products such as sunscreen, and pesticides that run off lawns and agricultural lands when it rains.

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) started to detect this chemicals in rivers throughout the U.S. nearly ten years ago, and then in 2003 intersex fish were collected from several Potomac River sites.

In September 2009, the USGS reported that intersex fish are widespread in numerous river basins throughout the United States.

"Every week new information is coming out about this," said Anne Sundermann, senior director of communications and outreach for the Potomac Conservancy.

While D.C.'s drinking water still meets the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) standards, the Conservancy argues that these water quality requirements are outdated, not accounting for endocrine disruptors. In addition, the Conservancy points out that wastewater treatment plants, which dump treated water back into rivers such as the Potomac, were mostly designed and built before the need to remove synthetic substances.

As nonprofits and federal agencies hash out potential new regulations, consumers can do their part by never flushing unused drugs down the toilet and finding sunscreens, perfumes, and other cosmetics with natural ingredients, avoiding harmful chemicals and anti-microbials.

--Tasha Eichenseher blog-headshot.jpg

About This Blog

Trying to understand what climate change, fuel efficiency, green chemistry, and sustainability have to do with you? Green Guide's blog helps you wade through the greenwashing and complicated science. Green Guide writers tease out some of the most notable stories and trends, and provide tips on how you can meaningfully and easily green your own life.

 

About National Geographic

Subscribe to This Blog

Get the RSS feed for this blog—and don't miss a single word.

RSS     What is RSS?