Sign up for free Newsletters

Once a month get new photos and expert tips.

Sign Up

Stars Archives

Watching a Planet's Birth in Real Time

Posted on September 24, 2009 | 1 Comments

Your friendly neighborhood geologist will tell you that the age of the Earth is 4.54 billion years, give or take 45 million.

Since modern humans have been around for only about 60,000 years of that time, it's hard for us to even guess at how exactly the planet was born.

Luckily we have a variety of tools at our disposal to make sure we're making highly educated guesses, including orbiting observatories like the Spitzer Space Telescope.

Using its infrared vision to peer through dust and thick gases, Spitzer has seen plenty of evidence for young star systems taking shape since it was launched in 2003. But most of that evidence has been fairly static, considering that it takes planets millions of years to develop.

Now, in a rare catch, astronomers using Spitzer think they've witnessed an early stage of planet formation in real time.

spitzer-planet-disk.jpg

—Image courtesy NASA/JPL-Caltech/R. Hurt (SSC)

The team watched one young star, LRLL 31, for five months, recording changes in its infrared light. The star had previously been called out for having a type of debris ring known as a transitional disk.

According to a popular theory of planet formation, some stars are surrounded by thick disks of dust and gases. Over time, larger grains within these disks start to collect material, and, like rolling snowballs, they grow larger as they pull more material unto themselves.

At some point, objects get so large that they carve gaps in the original disk, creating what's known as a transitional disk.

Spitzer showed that LRLL 31 has such a disk with both an inner and outer gap. What's more, the infrared light from the inner disk changes its brightness and wavelength every few weeks.

The team thinks the changes are due to a "companion"—some body circling the star inside the inner gap. As it orbits the star, this body pushes the disk's material around like a cornering boat pushes water, creating a "wave" that periodically changes the disk's height.

Higher waves facing Earth mean more and hotter material reflecting the host's starlight, so more infrared radiation and at shorter wavelengths. The wave also casts its shadow on the outer disk, blocking its longer-wavelength light.

The opposite scenario is true when the wave crests between Earth and the star.

Astronomers aren't 100 percent sure if the body creating the wave is really a developing planet or some other companion, maybe even another star.

But lead study author James Muzerolle, of the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore, notes in a statement: "For astronomers, watching anything in real-time is exciting. It's like we're biologists getting to watch cells grow in a petri dish, only our specimen is light-years away."

Shortly after the Chandra X-ray Observatory opened its eye for the first time in 1999, the orbiting probe snapped its first picture of a supernova remnant about 190,000 light-years away that's lovingly called 1E 0102.2-7219—or E0102 for short.

supernova-original.jpg

—Image courtesy NASA/CXC/SAO

Yesterday, ten years to the day after the probe's July 23 launch, the Chandra team released this updated version of the supernova's portrait:

supernova-new.jpg

—X-ray (NASA/CXC/MIT/D.Dewey et al. & NASA/CXC/SAO/J.DePasquale); Optical (NASA/STScI)

In the immortal word of Keanu Reeves: Whoa.

The brilliant new picture (click here for a larger version) combines Chandra's x-ray data with a visible-light image from its orbiting partner the Hubble Space Telescope. Together the two orbiters show the supernova's hot outer blast wave as a blue halo around the cooler inner material, with bright stars glittering in the background.

The green blob in the lower right is a cloud of gas and dust being illuminated by one very massive star (not pictured), probably not unlike the one that went boom and created E0102.

While the x-ray data add some great visual details to the shot, Chandra also contributed to the scientific analysis of the remnant. The x-rays, for instance, have helped astronomers get a better picture of the geometry of the explosion.

That's because x-rays with different levels of energy shine differently for Chandra. Since energy levels are linked to direction, scientists can tell how the object's components are moving relative to each other.

To us, E0102 may look like a colorful cotton ball in space. But Chandra reveals that the supernova is actually shaped more like a cylinder, and we're simply seeing the rounded face. There's a nifty animation of this here, in case pictures speak loader than words...

Btw, in its ten years of data collection, it seems Chandra has done its share of capturing puffballs in outer space. Here's a "rogues gallery" of some of the more famous explosions:

tycho.jpg

Tycho's Remnant

  • About 7,500 light-years away
  • Danish astronomer Tycho Brahe saw light from the initial explosion in 1572
  • Chandra snapped it in April 2003

—X-ray: NASA/CXC/SAO, Infrared: NASA/JPL-Caltech; Optical: MPIA, Calar Alto, O.Krause et al.







kepler.jpg

Kepler's Remnant

  • About 13,000 light-years away
  • Astronomer Johannes Kepler was among the first to see it as a new object in the sky in 1604
  • Chandra studied it from April to August 2006

—Image courtesy NASA/CXC/NCSU/S.Reynolds et al.






cassiopeia.jpg

Cassiopeia A

  • About 10,000 light-years away
  • Discovered in the constellation Cassiopeia via radio observations in 1947
  • Chandra snapped it in December 2007

—Image courtesy NASA/CXC/MIT/UMass Amherst/M.D.Stage et al.





sn1006c.jpg

SN1006

  • About 7,000 light-years away
  • The brightest supernova ever seen from Earth, witnessed in Asia, Europe, and the Middle East in A.D. 1006
  • Chandra snapped it in April 2003

—X-ray: NASA/CXC/Rutgers/G.Cassam-Chenai, J.Hughes et al.; Radio: NRAO/AUI/NSF/GBT/VLA/Dyer, Maddalena & Cornwell; Optical: Middlebury College/F.Winkler, NOAO/AURA/NSF/CTIO Schmidt & DSS

Bored by chocolates and jaded with roses? Give your sweetie the gift of the heavens for Valentine's Day this year.

betelgeuse.jpg

I'm talking about the Valentine's Day star, which graces the skies with its brilliant red glow each year in early February.

—Image courtesy A. Dupree (CfA), R. Gilliland (STScI), NASA

Now, this isn't exactly a name recognized by the International Astronomical Union—officially the Valentine's Day star is called Betelgeuse (pronounced kinda like "beetlejuice").

The holiday-themed moniker was coined by famed stargazer Jack Horkheimer, and there's a bunch of reasons why it's pretty darn apt. So step one will be to understand why the star is so romantic, and step two will be to find it!

► Read This Entire Post

Sun Storms: The Ultimate Homewreckers

Posted on December 18, 2008 | 0 Comments

I've been a baaaad blogger.

Headed out to San Francisco for the fall meeting of the American Geophysical Union, I had grand ambitions of doing it all: writing stories, editing copy, meeting scientists, hobnobbing with other writers, and of course live blogging from the meeting.

Life, it seems, had other plans. But never fear. Now that the crush of press conferences is abating, I've had some time to do almost everything on that wishlist, including getting caught up on planetary news.

I've got a couple things in the works culled from AGU, including news on arctic Mars and possibly some bits about habitable exoplanets, auroras on Jupiter and Saturn, and the controversy over lightning on Venus.

First, though, I sat in on a talk about solar storms and the surprising find that Earth's magnetosphere has been leaking big time and is even now building up a layer of solar particles.

► Read This Entire Post

The tug-of-war between space-based and ground-based telescopes continues, with today's release of what's being called the sharpest full-planet image of Jupiter taken by an on-the-ground observatory.

jupiter-sharpest.jpg

—Image courtesy ESO

[versus]

jupiter-hubble.jpg

Jupiter, as seen by the Hubble Space Telescope in 2007
—Image courtesy NASA, ESA, and the Hubble Heritage Team (AURA/STScI)

An international team used the ESO's Very Large Telescope in Chile to stare right at Jupiter for almost two hours straight.

The resulting infrared image revealed that Jupiter has lowered its belt. The bulk of the haze within the bight band around Jupiter's midsection has migrated south by more than 3,700 miles (6,000 kilometers) since 2005, the researchers said.

"The change we see in the haze could be related to big changes in cloud patterns associated with last year's planet-wide upheaval, but we need to look at more data to narrow down precisely when the changes occurred," team member Mike Wong said in a press release.

[Incidentally, the global upheaval he's referring to involved massive changes in cloud patterns and other wild weather features observed in 2007.]

In an interview with NatGeo News reporter Richard A. Lovett, lead researcher Franck Marchis, a planetary astronomer at the University of California, Berkeley, and the SETI Institute, said of the new image: "We have something comparable to or even better than the Hubble Space Telescope."

Wow. But this isn't the first time researchers using ground-based 'scopes have compared their work to products of the aging but much beloved Hubble.

► Read This Entire Post

About This Blog

The moon
From dwarf planets to hot Jupiters, join NatGeo News space and tech editor Victoria Jaggard in a global discussion about all things extraterrestrial.


news.nationalgeographic.com

Share This

Add to Technorati Favorites
 

Subscribe to This Blog

Get the RSS feed for this blog—and don't miss a single word.

RSS     What is RSS?

Blogroll