Sign up for free Newsletters

Once a month get new photos and expert tips.

Sign Up

Geography Archives

goes-p-decal.jpg

—Image courtesy NOAA

Next week NASA will launch the latest in a series of satellites run by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration designed to track extreme weather events from space.

Known as the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites, or GOES, each craft carries a letter designation until it arrives in orbit, when it is renamed with a number.

Proving that someone should really think about such naming conventions beforehand, the craft slated to launch on March 2 will be GOES P.

If only GOES was a series of probes headed to Uranus ...

Done snickering? Phew, OK.

In all seriousness, GOES P will play on important role in NOAA's efforts to provide continuous coverage of weather events—from tornadoes and hurricanes to flash floods and solar storms—across all 50 U.S. states.

The satellites sit in geostationary orbit, which means each one is "fixed" in place over a particular geographic region.

Here, for example, is a color-enhanced picture from GOES 11, aka GOES WEST, of conditions along the Pacific coast right now:

goes-west-feb.jpg

—Image courtesy NOAA

By watching for changes over time in things such as cloud cover and temperature, NOAA can track the formation of major events, hopefully offering enough warning to get people out of Nature's way.

GOES P will join GOES 14 as a back-up satellite, to be "stored" in orbit and turned on only if another GOES satellite stops functioning.

GOES 13 was also launched as an orbital spare in 2006, but it will soon be brought online permanently to replace GOES 12, which is being reassigned to keep watch over South America as part of the [also humorously named] Global Earth Observation System of Systems.

In case you're wondering, GOES 1 was launched in 1975. If GOES P makes it into space and is pronounced operational, it will become GOES 15.

GOES 3 and 7 were used as communications satellites, while the rest of 1 through 10 were either decommissioned or—in the case of GOES G—didn't make it into orbit.

"Death Star" Moon Gets Its Close-Up

Posted on February 16, 2010 | 0 Comments

"That's no moon. Oh, wait, yes it is!"

mimas-whole.jpg

—Image courtesy NASA/JPL/Space Science Institute

When Luke said that TIE fighter was headed toward a "small moon," he must have had Mimas on his mind.

Since the 1980s this small Saturn moon has been likened to the fictional Death Star, thanks to its most noticeable blemish, the 88-mile-wide (140-kilometer-wide) Herschel Crater.

Of course, while the Death Star's "crater" was really a weapon that could obliterate planets, Mimas's crater was made by an impact that likely almost shattered the tiny moon.

For starters, the basin's width is almost a third of the width of the moon as a whole—for a rocky body, take a hit like that without getting rattled.

In fact, fractures on the other side of Mimas appear to have been made by the impact shock as it traveled clean through the moon.

mimas-second.jpg

The second Death Star? Nah, just an incomplete image from Cassini.
—Image courtesy NASA/JPL/Space Science Institute

Despite this blow and some other serious, if smaller scale, cratering, Mimas is the tiniest body that stays round thanks to its own gravity.

Scientifically speaking, this is a moon we would like to know better.

Today NASA unveiled some of its most detailed pictures yet of Mimas, taken during a close approach by the Cassini orbiter.

Cassini zoomed in for the flyby last week, making its closest pass on Saturday, at a mere 5,900 miles (9,500 kilometers) from the moon's surface.

The raw pictures took a few days to get beamed back to Earth, landing in NASA's lap just yesterday. But the unprocessed snapshots are already revealing some of Mimas's secrets, including the bright and amazingly steep slopes inside Herschel.

mimas-surface.jpg

Mimas's surface, up close and personal
—Image courtesy NASA/JPL/Space Science Institute

"This flyby has been like looking at a cell or an onion skin under the microscope for the first time," Bonnie Buratti, one of the science team leaders, said in a statement.

"We'd seen the large crater from afar since the early 1980s, but now its small bumps and blemishes are all clearly visible."

Later processing and study of the pictures could offer even more tidbits about the pockmarked moon, such as what its exact composition might be, why its south pole is lacking in large craters, and just how it influences Saturn's rings.

Mimas (near) and Epimetheus (far) lie along Saturn's ringplane in a natural-color snapshot from Cassini.
—Image courtesy NASA/JPL/Space Science Institute

mimas-rings.jpg

Johnny Cash fans take heed: The first solar eclipse of 2010 will create a "ring of fire" over Africa, India, and China on January 15.

That's because it will be an annular eclipse, and no, that is not a typo: I mean annular, not annual.

Solar eclipses in general happen because every now and then the moon crosses between Earth and the sun during the daytime, covering up the solar disk and casting a huuuuge shadow over Earth. [Example: a 2006 eclipse shadow as seen from the International Space Station.]

Thanks to Earth's rotation and the not-quite-circular orbits of our planet and our moon, any given eclipse will be visible from different locations on Earth for different lengths of time and only along a narrow track.

We also get treated to different types of eclipses depending on how much of the sun gets covered up.

An annular eclipse happens when the moon is farther from Earth, so that its apparent size doesn't quite blot out the sun. These eclipses allow an annulus, or ring, of fiery light to peak 'round the moon.

Last year also kicked off with an annular eclipse on January 26. That eclipse started over the open Indian Ocean, finally crossing over land in Indonesia. You can check out a few of last year's annular eclipse pictures here.

For 2010, the annular path will start over central Africa, sweeping across Uganda, Kenya, and Somalia. The eclipse will last the longest—11 minutes, 8 seconds—over the Indian Ocean.

annular-eclipse-2010.jpg

—Image courtesy F. Espenak, NASA/GSFC

For those with means and a deep love of eclipses, it might be worth it to rent a boat: There won't be another annular eclipse lasting that long until December 23, 3043!

Otherwise, the longest this year's annular eclipse will last over land is 10 minutes, 45 seconds in the Maldive Islands.

From there the path nicks the southern tip of India, hits Myanmar (Burma), and then heads into China, ending at last over the Shandong Peninsula.

In case you're curious, the second solar eclipse of 2010 will be a total eclipse on July 11. That just happens to be my best friend's birthday, so maybe this year I should treat her to an eclipse-chasing get-a-way ...

Eclipses are actually great tourism drivers, since they make for some pretty dramatic sights in a variety of exotic locations. The 2010 total solar eclipse, for instance, will be visible from land only in the remote South Pacific, including the famed Isla de Pascua, aka Easter Island.

I am drooling with anticipation over the potential photo opps here: Those looming stone heads will make for some pretty amazing scenery against which to frame a total solar eclipse.

So don't let me down, TWAN, in case I can't make the trip myself!

nasa-wise-picture.jpg

—Picture courtesy NASA/JPL-Caltech

Yesterday NASA successfully hurtled another telescope into the heavens: the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer, or WISE.

Judging from the plethora of news coverage, WISE has quite a few people pretty excited. After all, NASA has only a handful of operational space telescopes up there right now ... roughly 15 by my count [and I challenge you to name more than three without Googling].

Given the newbie's relatively short projected life span of ten months, I can only imagine that all the media hoopla is over WISE's potential.

Mission managers are hailing the craft's ability to scan the entire night sky in infrared with unprecedented detail, possibly helping us to discover new comets, asteroids, brown dwarfs—maybe even a new planet within our solar system.

Even with that provocative prediction, it's hard to get some folk excited about NASA and their big-budget telescopes. Space can seem so remote and cold, and it can be a genuine challenge tethering the importance of astronomy to our earthly pursuits.

So taking a cue from my colleagues in the TV industry, I started wondering: What are some of the superlatives that apply to telescopes here on Earth that might put stars in even an astrophobe's eyes?

BIGGEST

For now, at least, the world's biggest optical telescope is the Gran Telescopio Canarias on the Spanish-held island of La Palma in the Canary Islands.

The telescope's segmented, honeycomb-like mirror has an aperture, or light-collecting potential, of 10.4 meters (34 feet).

canarias.jpg

—GTC photo by Pablo Bonet

For contrast, think of all the fantastic pictures we have from the Hubble Space Telescope, and it has just a 2.4-meter (7.8-foot) aperture!

But GTC might not hold its title for long. The Thirty Meter Telescope and the Giant Magellan Telescope are both U.S.-based projects aiming to create the world's biggest optical telescope.

TMT is slated to join the cluster of domes on Hawaii's Mauna Kea volcano, while Magellan is bound for the mountains of Las Campanas, Chile.

Meanwhile, in Europe, folks are hard at work on the aptly named European Extremely Large Telescope, a 42-meter (137.8-foot) monstrosity yet to find a suitable home.

arecibo.jpg

—Photo courtesy of the NAIC - Arecibo Observatory, a facility of the NSF

Other than optical, the biggest single-dish radio telescope is the Arecibo Observatory in Puerto Rico.

The reflector dish, which is built into the ground to keep it from collapsing under its own weight, covers nearly 20 acres (8 hectares).

HIGHEST

If climbing the highest mountain is more your style, you should try for a visit to the Llano de Chajnantor Observatory in Chile's northern Atacama desert.

The site actually hosts several submillimeter telescopes, built on a plateau 16,667 feet (5,080 meters) above sea level.

chile.jpg

—Llano de Chajnantor photo by Ricardo Bustos

(PS, submillimeter is a type of microwave radiation closest to infrared in the light spectrum. These low-energy waves help astronomers peer through otherwise opaque dust clouds to see, for example, how stars are born.)

The record for the highest optical telescope—aside from the ones in space, of course—has been held since 2002 by the Indian Astronomical Observatory, sitting at 14,800 feet (4,517 meters) above sea level in the Himalaya.

DEEPEST

It's easy to see why telescopes on the ground would try to match telescopes in orbit by getting bigger or going higher. But oddly enough, there are some Earth-based telescopes that do their jobs best by seeing how low they can go.

The deepest telescopes on Earth look for neutrinos—small uncharged particles that can come from nuclear reactions, such as those that happen inside stars, or from crashes among cosmic rays.

Neutrinos are *extremely* hard to detect, since they tend to pass right through normal matter without disturbing anything. For example, more than 50 trillion neutrinos from the sun pass through the human body every second.

Finding even a few means setting up detectors far from any sources of background radiation, usually surrounded by purified liquids.

Studying neutrinos means better understanding the sun, other stars, and maybe even the properties of mysterious dark matter.

There are two neutrino telescopes that could vie for the title of deepest telescope: The Baikal Deep Underwater Neutrino Experiment in Siberia's Lake Baikal, and the Super-Kamiokande (or Super-K) neutrino observatory in Japan.

Technically Baikal is deeper at about 3,900 feet (1,200 meters) below sea level, but it's more an array of probes set up in a lake than its own custom-made facility.

By contrast, Super-K is a huge, human-made water tank lined with glass tubes that was built about a mile (1.6 kilometers) under a Japanese mountain.

MOST REMOTE

And finally, what would any explorer's guide to extreme telescopes be without a visit to an observatory that requires long arduous treks and polar gear?

polar.jpg

—Photo by Bradford Benson, NSF

While most observatories set themselves up far from city lights, it's hard to top the distances astronomers must travel to use the NSF-funded South Pole Telescope in Antarctica.

The observatory lies on an ice sheet about 11 hours away by plane from the nearest major city.

It's cold, it's isolated, and it's a great place to look at the universe via millimeter and submillimeter light, searching for distant galaxy clusters or analyzing the radiation afterglow of the big bang.

Ever since Pluto got voted off the island, most astronomers have defined a planet as a body orbiting a star—dead or alive—that is a) massive enough to be rounded by its own gravity, b) not massive enough to ignite itself into starhood, and c) domineering enough to have swept its neighborhood clean of smaller planetary seedlings.

Phew, what a mouthful!

But as we know from our own solar system, not all planets are created equal, and things get really interesting when we try to define the types of planets that might support life.

Traditionally when we think of a habitable world, we think of Earth. Makes sense: To date it's our only frame of reference for a planet that supports plants, animals, even microbes. So it's as good a model as any in terms of what we'd want habitable exoplanets to look like.

kilimanjaro.jpg

A 3-D view of Mount Kilimanjaro in Tanzania, compiled from satellite data
—Image courtesy NASA/JPL/NIMA

Hence the huge emphasis among planet hunters on the so-called Goldilocks Zone, where it's not too hot and not too cold. A planet inside this zone would be just right for liquid water and life-giving sunshine.

In recent years that hypothetical zone has been getting bigger, it seems, especially as expeditions to the deep ocean and volcanic peaks have expanded the conditions in which we thought life could exist.

Enter Rory Barnes, a University of Washington postdoctoral researcher who's here to rain on that parade.

► Read This Entire Post

About This Blog

The moon
From dwarf planets to hot Jupiters, join NatGeo News space and tech editor Victoria Jaggard in a global discussion about all things extraterrestrial.


news.nationalgeographic.com

Share This

Add to Technorati Favorites
 

Subscribe to This Blog

Get the RSS feed for this blog—and don't miss a single word.

RSS     What is RSS?

Blogroll