Sign up for free Newsletters

Once a month get new photos and expert tips.

Sign Up

July 2009 Archives

Shortly after the Chandra X-ray Observatory opened its eye for the first time in 1999, the orbiting probe snapped its first picture of a supernova remnant about 190,000 light-years away that's lovingly called 1E 0102.2-7219—or E0102 for short.

supernova-original.jpg

—Image courtesy NASA/CXC/SAO

Yesterday, ten years to the day after the probe's July 23 launch, the Chandra team released this updated version of the supernova's portrait:

supernova-new.jpg

—X-ray (NASA/CXC/MIT/D.Dewey et al. & NASA/CXC/SAO/J.DePasquale); Optical (NASA/STScI)

In the immortal word of Keanu Reeves: Whoa.

The brilliant new picture (click here for a larger version) combines Chandra's x-ray data with a visible-light image from its orbiting partner the Hubble Space Telescope. Together the two orbiters show the supernova's hot outer blast wave as a blue halo around the cooler inner material, with bright stars glittering in the background.

The green blob in the lower right is a cloud of gas and dust being illuminated by one very massive star (not pictured), probably not unlike the one that went boom and created E0102.

While the x-ray data add some great visual details to the shot, Chandra also contributed to the scientific analysis of the remnant. The x-rays, for instance, have helped astronomers get a better picture of the geometry of the explosion.

That's because x-rays with different levels of energy shine differently for Chandra. Since energy levels are linked to direction, scientists can tell how the object's components are moving relative to each other.

To us, E0102 may look like a colorful cotton ball in space. But Chandra reveals that the supernova is actually shaped more like a cylinder, and we're simply seeing the rounded face. There's a nifty animation of this here, in case pictures speak loader than words...

Btw, in its ten years of data collection, it seems Chandra has done its share of capturing puffballs in outer space. Here's a "rogues gallery" of some of the more famous explosions:

tycho.jpg

Tycho's Remnant

  • About 7,500 light-years away
  • Danish astronomer Tycho Brahe saw light from the initial explosion in 1572
  • Chandra snapped it in April 2003

—X-ray: NASA/CXC/SAO, Infrared: NASA/JPL-Caltech; Optical: MPIA, Calar Alto, O.Krause et al.







kepler.jpg

Kepler's Remnant

  • About 13,000 light-years away
  • Astronomer Johannes Kepler was among the first to see it as a new object in the sky in 1604
  • Chandra studied it from April to August 2006

—Image courtesy NASA/CXC/NCSU/S.Reynolds et al.






cassiopeia.jpg

Cassiopeia A

  • About 10,000 light-years away
  • Discovered in the constellation Cassiopeia via radio observations in 1947
  • Chandra snapped it in December 2007

—Image courtesy NASA/CXC/MIT/UMass Amherst/M.D.Stage et al.





sn1006c.jpg

SN1006

  • About 7,000 light-years away
  • The brightest supernova ever seen from Earth, witnessed in Asia, Europe, and the Middle East in A.D. 1006
  • Chandra snapped it in April 2003

—X-ray: NASA/CXC/Rutgers/G.Cassam-Chenai, J.Hughes et al.; Radio: NRAO/AUI/NSF/GBT/VLA/Dyer, Maddalena & Cornwell; Optical: Middlebury College/F.Winkler, NOAO/AURA/NSF/CTIO Schmidt & DSS

Apollo 11 Mania

Posted on July 20, 2009 | 1 Comments

apollo-11-patch.jpg

Did you hear? Today, July 20, 2009, is the 40th anniversary of the day humans first set foot on the moon.

Yeah, I know. If you read newspapers/watch TV/surf the web/opened your door this morning, you've probably been flooded with Apollo 11 news by now.

On one hand, it's quite the achievement worth celebrating. On the other, it's a reminder of all we have *not* accomplished in the field of human space travel over the past 40 years.

For our part, NatGeo has been busy creating some fascinating content to commemorate the heady days of the Apollo program.

One of my personal favorites is an interactive version of a pressed vinyl record called Sounds of the Space Age, which was an insert in the December 1969 issue of the magazine.

I may not be old enough to remember the moon landings (technically, I wasn't born yet!) but man, I do recall those wonderfully floppy records. I'm pretty sure I had one with a McDonald's song that had me crooning the ingredients in a Big Mac when I was 12...

Speaking of Micky Ds, some good folks working out of a now-defunct restaurant in California have been restoring the original 1960s Lunar Orbiter pictures taken to help scout out landing sites for the Apollo program, and we've got a few examples of their work on display.

To get a real sense of how well satellites could see back then, check out a zoomable version of the famous "Earthrise" image taken by the first Lunar Orbiter.

Still not convinced man landed on the moon? Writer Ker Than interviewed a couple delightfully witty experts, who gave him the skinny on why some of the more common hoax theories are all wet. And if historic images don't seal the deal, check out pictures released this weekend showing quite clearly the shadow of a lunar lander.

Finally, here's a shameless plug for a piece I scared up on the question of who, exactly, can claim the moon.

There's a ton more from us, and so much good, funny, thoughtful, and touching Apollo coverage elsewhere online.

It might seem weird to get so excited at the 40th, with the 50th just a few short years away. But as one historian recently noted, this could be the last major anniversary when all of the original Apollo 11 crewmates can still gather to tell tales. So make the most of it, people, we're living history even as we relive that historic day.

About This Blog

The moon
From dwarf planets to hot Jupiters, join NatGeo News space and tech editor Victoria Jaggard in a global discussion about all things extraterrestrial.


news.nationalgeographic.com

Share This

Add to Technorati Favorites
 

Subscribe to This Blog

Get the RSS feed for this blog—and don't miss a single word.

RSS     What is RSS?

Blogroll