Sign up for free Newsletters

Once a month get new photos and expert tips.

Sign Up

Search Results

Results tagged “human origins” from NatGeo News Watch

As we observe the 150th anniversary this month of the first publication of Charles Darwin's On the Origin of Species, a new book reviews evolution and ranks the top one hundred most influential species of all time.

Homo sapiens is not at the top of the list.

In fact, we humans, who like to imagine that we are the masters of the universe, don't even rank in the top five.

The most influential species (defined as the species that has most changed life on Earth) is ... the earthworm.

earthworms1.jpg

Photo courtesy USDA

"According to Charles Darwin, no living thing has had such a profound impact on history as has the earthworm," says Christopher Lloyd, a history scholar at Cambridge University, UK, and author of What on Earth Evolved?: 100 Species that Changed the World (Bloomsbury, November 2009, $45).

what-on-earth-evolved-cover.jpg

After considering the most important species that evolved before the ascent of human civilization, from the beginning of life on Earth until about 12,000 years ago, and then mulling all the species that have been successful since 12,000 years ago--that is the species that have flourished because of modern humans--Lloyd finds that he agrees with Charles Darwin: The earthworm is indeed the most influential species in the history of the planet.

Descendants of sea worms that existed five hundred million years ago, earthworms came ashore with the first invertebrate invasions of the land, making their living in damp soils broken up by bacteria, fungi and the roots of colonizing plants, Lloyd writes. "These earthworms have been ploughing up the earth, ventilating the soil and nourishing terrestrial ecosystems with their excrement ever since."

The survivors of five mass extinctions, earthworms have had profound impacts on human history, Lloyd says.

"Were it not for their continuous regeneration of soils around damp river valleys such as the Nile, Indus, and Euphrates, early agricultural societies in Egypt, India, and Mesopotamia could never have succeeded in building humanity's first large-scale urban communities." 

"Wherever eathworms plough, people thrive. When worms perish, societies collapse."

Throughout human history earthworms have unintentionally but undeniably triggered the rise of civilizations, Lloyd adds. "Wherever eathworms plough, people thrive. When worms perish, societies collapse."

The European earthworm (Lumbricus terrestris) is probably the most prolific and invasive species in the world, Lloyd says.

"Its success is largely thanks to the spread of Europeans, c. 1600 onwards.

"Immigrant farmers inadvertently brought these earthworms, sometimes called 'night crawlers,' in everything from the soil in their potted plants and their horses' hooves, to the treads of their boots and the wheels of their wagons.

"Today there is hardly a region of North America where Europe's earthworms have not made a home for themselves. There they continue to plough, ventilate and fertilize the soil to the general benefit of life in and on the Earth."

Before Man, After Man

What on Earth Evolved? is divided into two sections--Before Man and After Man. Starting with the early Earth, when loose strands of genetic code swarmed the planet, Lloyd explores the most significant lifeforms that evolved in the deep oceans and then wriggled ashore to become pioneers of life on land. In the second section, the author shows how co-evolution of humans and numerous other key species transformed Earth over the past 12,000 years.

A newspaper science and technology correspondent in a previous career, Lloyd has produced an accessible read, guiding the reader through capsule biographies of a hundred of the most influential species. They include slime, sea scorpions, dragonflies, potatoes, ants, tulips, sheep, dogs, cats, coca, opium, poppies, and grapes.

He ranks the species into a table of influence, revealing those that have most changed life on Earth. Academics will no doubt debate the selection and process, but Lloyd makes a compelling, albeit concise, case for each species. The full list of the hundred most influential species may be seen on the book's Web site, or in the book itself.

Covering all of life in one book would be impossible, of course, but Lloyd has taken an interesting approach to some of the most marvelous products of evolution, leading to renewed appreciation of how much life has succeeded through both competition and collaboration.

Here is Lloyd's top ten most influential species of all evolution:

Evolution's top ten species

1. Earthworm
Made it possible for humans to cultivate the planet, settle, and build civilizations.

2. Algae
Without the countless forms of microscopic algae, larger forms of sea life would never have been able to evolve. All land plants are descended from ancestral forms of algae.

3. Cyanobacteria
Plants, trees, and animals all owe their existence to the presence of oxygen in the atmosphere and oceans, supplies of which were originally established by cyanobacteria, a photosynthesizing bacterium that breaks down carbon dioxide and excretes oxygen.

4. Rhizobia
Organisms capable of "fixing" atmospheric nitrogen into soluble nitrates that fertilize the soil so that plants and trees can thrive.

5. Lactobacillus
Bacteria that live inside the human colon, providing beneficial services such as assistance with digestion of milk and protection against harmful bacteria and organisms such as viruses and fungi.

6. Homo sapiens
Humans did not crack the No. 1 position on Lloyd's list, but we merit five pages in his 416-page book and we are the only mammal in the top 10. We lose points chiefly as a result of our recent evolutionary emergence.

We may not rank as the most influential species in this analysis, but our impact pervades the past 12,000 years as we learned to farm animals and plants and harness mch of the resources of the planet.  In that time humans have had a profound impact on many other species, nurturing those useful to us and driving many that are of little value to us into isolation and even into extinction. Our impact on evolution is clearly in its early phases.

7. Stony corals
Coral reefs are powerful places for the natural conservation and co-operation of species, resulting in the construction of massive undewrwater mountains that house an extraordinary diversity of life.

8. Yeast
It is almost exclusively thanks to the action of this single-celled microscopic fungus that humanity has been able to enjoy everything from leavened bread to fine wine. Some of our best prospects for fuelling sustainable industrialization and transportation in the future are based on ethanol, a by-product of yeast.

9. Influenza
One of humanity's biggest ever killers and still the largest threat to populations on Earth.

10. Penicillium
A naturally occurring antibiotic that has transformed modern medicine and substantially increased human populations.

Bloomsbury Publishing provided a copy of What on Earth Evolved? for this entry.

A 37-million-year-old fossil primate from Egypt, described in this week's issue of Nature, moves a controversial German fossil known as Ida out of the human lineage, Nature News reports.

"Teeth and ankle bones of the new Egyptian specimen show that the 47-million-year-old Ida, formally called Darwinius masillae, is not in the lineage of early apes and monkeys (haplorhines), but instead belongs to ancestors (adapiforms) of today's lemurs and lorises," Nature News said.

lemur-1-picture.jpg
Artist's reconstruction of the lower jaw of a 37 million-year-old Egyptian primate, Afradapis. The fossil primate Darwinius (popularly known as Ida) and Afradapis, the new find, are not related to humans, researchers say.

Illustration courtesy of: Zina Deretsky, National Science Foundation

The National Science Foundation, which supported the new research, said paleontologists from three American universities "are revealing features of a newly discovered African primate and solving a riddle about humankind's evolutionary past." 

Lead researcher Erik Seiffert of New York's Stony Brook University and his colleagues say their find has the potential to clear up a portion of the human evolutionary tree by resolving the location of a misplaced species, NSF said in a statement.

"The recently described fossil Darwinius, originally recovered from a disused quarry near Messel, Germany in the 1980s, has been widely publicized as an important 'link' in the lineage to higher primates," said Seiffert.

He and his research team recently discovered a lemur-like relative of Darwinius in about 40 miles outside Cairo, Egypt. They named it Afradapis and analyzed its place in primate evolution.

"Our study results indicate that Darwinius and its now extinct relatives, including Afradapis, are not in the evolutionary lineage leading to monkeys, apes, and humans as has been debated," he said. "Instead they are more closely related to the living lemurs and lorises."

lemur3-picture.jpg
Using a method called parsimony analysis to reconstruct the most likely family tree of living and extinct primates, taking into consideration virtually all of the available anatomical evidence that can be observed, palentologists determined that Darwinius and its now extinct relatives, including Afradapis, are not on the evolutionary lineage leading to Old World monkey's, apes and humans, but instead are more closely related to the living lemurs and lorises.

Illustration courtesy of Erik Seiffert, Stony Brook University

Seiffert's team, which includes Jonathan M. G. Perry of Midwestern University, Ill; Elwyn L. Simons of Duke University, N.C. and Doug M. Boyer also of Stony Brook, base their findings on analysis of Afradapis fossils collected from an excavation site modestly called BQ-2 near the Fayum Depression in northern Egypt.

lemur5-picture.jpg
Paleontologists searched an area near the Fayum Depression in northern Egypt about 40 miles outside Cairo for clues to the primate evolution tree.

Photo courtesy of Erik Seiffert, Stony Brook University

They first discovered a poorly preserved Afradapis fossil, a fragment that showed features of the front teeth and jaw bone that were almost identical to those of later Old World monkeys, NSF said. "But it didn't make sense to the researchers that a member of that primate lineage would have been present in Africa at such an early time period, about 37 million years ago.

"Soon they recovered additional Afradapis fossils and through dental analysis eventually clarified that Afradapis and Darwinius weren't in the line of Old World monkeys, apes and humans, but had concurrently evolved similar features with their distant relative, a type of anthropoid."

"The similar features evolved through the process of convergent evolution," Seiffert explained. "This means that under similar selection pressures, both lineages came to have similar specializations, but these features were not present in their last common ancestor."

Noted shared specializations from dental examinations include fusion of the two halves of the jaw, reduction and loss of the first few premolar teeth, and the presence of front incisors that are each shaped like a spatula, rather than being shaped more like a cone.

lemur4-picture.jpg
Students of the early primate fossil record generally hold two views about the evolution of an extinct group of lemur-like primates called adapiforms, NSF said in a statement. "A majority of students consider adapiforms to be ancient relatives of a primate suborder that includes lemurs and lorises. A minority view is that adapiforms are more closely related to monkeys and apes.

"The latter hypothesis hinges on features such as fusion of the two halves of the jaw, reduction and loss of the first few premolar teeth, and the presence of incisors. Researchers say their studies of the jaw and teeth of the adapiform Afradapis shows that adapiforms and the distant relatives of monkeys and apes independently evolved similar features."

Photo courtesy of Erik Seiffert, Stony Brook University

Interestingly, the ancestors of Old World monkeys, apes, and humans developed these features millions of years later, long after Afradapis and Darwinius were extinct, NSF said. "But, reconstructing the most likely family tree of both living and extinct primates, taking into consideration virtually all available anatomical evidence, the paleontologists determined that Darwinius, and its relative Afradapis, are not in the direct evolutionary line with humans."

"Our discoveries certainly contribute to a growing body of evidence that indicates that convergent evolution was a common phenomenon in early primate evolution," Seiffert said.

The finding is reported in the October 20 issue of the journal Nature. NSF supports the research through its social, behavioral and economic sciences directorate's physical anthropology program.

Our ancestors underwent a previously unknown stage of evolution over more than a million years before "Lucy", the iconic early human ancestor specimen that walked the Earth 3.2 million years ago," National Geographic Magazine science editor Jamie Shreeve reports today.

earliest-human-ancestor-picture.jpg

Ardipithecus ramidus, a hominid species that lived 4.4 million years ago in the Afar Rift region of northeastern Ethiopia. This is now the earliest skeleton known from the human branch of the primate family tree, scientists say. "The human branch constitutes the zoological family 'Hominidae;' 'hominids' include Homo sapiens as well as all species closer to humans than to chimpanzees and bonobos, our closest living relatives," according to the journal Science.  The discoveries provide new insights into how hominids might have emerged from an ancestral ape, scientists say.

Illustration courtesy J. H. Matternes via Science/AAAS 

The finding, published in tomorrow's journal Science, is based on the discovery of the oldest fossil human skeleton, a small-brained, 110-pound (50-kilogram) female of the species called Ardipithecus ramidus.

"The fossil puts to rest the notion, popular since Darwin's time, that a chimpanzee-like 'missing link,' midway resembling something between humans and today's apes, would eventually be found at the root of the human family tree," Shreeve writes.

"Indeed, the new evidence suggests that the study of chimpanzee anatomy and behavior, long used to infer the nature of ... the earliest human ancestors, is largely irrelevant to understanding our beginnings."

Read the story, see photos, learn more about the fossil from an interactive:

Oldest "Human" Skeleton Found--Disproves "Missing Link" 

PHOTOS: Oldest "Human" Skeleton Refutes "Missing Link"

Interactive: Explore Ardipithecus ramidus

 

Walking for sex

Jamie Shreeve also launched his new blog today with a related piece on Ardi's sex life. (Ardi is the name scientists have given this fossil).

It is fascinating reading, "especially if you like learning why human females don't know when they are ovulating, and men lack the clacker-sized testicles and bristly penises tk sported by chimpanzees," Shreeve writes. Read the rest of this at:

Did early humans start walking for sex?

science-cover-image.jpgScience
is publishing 11 different papers about the Ardi research, involving more than 40 different authors.

In this 200th anniversary year of Darwin's birth, Science is pleased to publish the results of many years of scientific research that suggest an unexpected form for our last common ancestor with the chimpanzees," writes Bruce Alberts, Editor-in-Chief of Science, in an editorial about the research.

"The history of science assures us that powerful new techniques will be developed in the coming years to accelerate such research, as they have been in the past," Alberts writes. "We can thus be certain that scientists will eventually obtain a rather detailed record showing how the anatomy of the human body evolved over many millions of years."

Science cover illustration copyright 2008 T.H. White

African ancestry picture 1.jpg
The largest-ever study on African genetics has determined that the ancestral origin of humans was probably located in southern Africa, near the South Africa-Namibia border, scientists said today.

African, American, and European researchers working in collaboration over ten years released their study of African genetic data, providing a library of new information on the continent which is thought to be the source of the oldest settlements of modern humans, said a news statement released by the University of Pennsylvania (Penn).

Sarah Tishkoff collects samples in Tanzania. Participants provided information about their ethnicity, language, parents, and grandparents.

Photo courtesy of Sarah Tishkoff

"The study demonstrates startling diversity on the continent, shared ancestry among geographically diverse groups and traces the origins of Africans and African Americans," the statement said. The research is published in the April 30 issue of the journal Science Express.

african-ancestry-map.jpg

The yellow shaded area on the border of South Africa and Namibia is the likely ancestral birthplace of modern humans, researchers calculate. The arrow on the Red Sea indicates the likely point where modern humans first left Africa to colonize the rest of the world.

Map courtesy Google Earth

The research team said that its work demonstrated that there is more genetic diversity in Africa than anywhere else on earth.

They analyzed the DNA of more than 3,000 individuals--from 121 African populations, 4 African American populations and 60 non-African populations--to trace the genetic structure of Africans to 14 ancestral population clusters that correlated with ethnicity and shared cultural and/or linguistic properties.

Extrapolating the data, scientists were able to map ancient migrations of populations and determined that the exit point of modern humans out of Africa was near the middle of the Red Sea in East Africa, the news statement added. (See map above.)

Ancient Common Ancestry

"They also provide evidence for ancient common ancestry of geographically diverse hunter-gatherer populations in Africa, including Pygmies from central Africa and click-speaking populations from southern and eastern Africa, suggesting the possibility that the original pygmy language may have contained clicks. Overall, they demonstrate remarkable correspondence between cultural, linguistic, and genetic diversity in Africa."

"This is the largest study to date of African genetic diversity in the nuclear genome," said Sarah Tishkoff, a geneticist with joint appointments in the School of Arts and Sciences and the School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania.

"This long term collaboration, involving an international team of researchers and years of research expeditions to collect samples from populations living in remote regions of Africa, has resulted in novel insights about levels and patterns of genetic diversity in Africa, a region that has been underrepresented in human genetic studies.

"Our goal has been to do research that will benefit Africans, both by learning more about their population history and by setting the stage for future genetic studies, including studies of genetic and environmental risk factors for disease and drug response."

african-ancestry-picture-2.jpg

Hadza and Datog peoples listen to an explanation of the study in a village near Lake
Eyasi in the Arusha district of northern Tanzania.

Photo courtesy of Sarah Tishkoff

Tishkoff says that there is no single African population that is representative of the diversity present on the continent. Therefore, many ethnically diverse African populations should be included in studies of human genetic variation, disease susceptibility, and drug response.

Anthropologists, historians and linguists now have at their disposal a completely new volume of research with which to test theories of human migration, cultural evolution and population history in Africa, Penn said.

"Basic scientists, physicians and public health officials now have a foundation for illuminating the complex history of Africans and African-Americans, with implications for studies aimed at finding disease genes in these populations and learning which genetic differences make some individuals more susceptible to diseases like HIV, cancer or malaria."

African American Ancestry

The researchers said the study also sheds light on African American ancestry, which they find originates predominantly from western African Niger-Kordofanian (71 percent), European (13 percent), and other African (8 percent) populations, although admixture levels varied considerably among individuals.

These results could have important implications for the design and interpretation of studies which aim to identify genetic and environmental risk factors for diseases common in the African American community, including prostate cancer, hypertension and diabetes.

comet-1.jpg

Illustration by Chris Foss/NGS

Diamond dust found in 12,900-year-old sediments at six North American sites boosts evidence of Earth's impact with a swarm of comets at that time, researchers reported today.

The discovery supports the theory that an impact with an extraterrestrial object may have contributed to the disappearance of large mammals and the Clovis culture of prehistoric humans, the scientists say.

► Read This Entire Post

cave-lede.jpg

Last seen two million years ago, one of the early stone tools discovered in Wonderwerk Cave.

Photo by M. Chazan

The earliest evidence for cave occupation by hominids has been discovered in South Africa.

Stone tools found at the bottom level of Wonderwerk Cave show that human ancestors were in the cave two million years ago, earlier than thought, according to an international research team led by Michael Chazan, director of the University of Toronto's Archaeology Centre.

Geological evidence indicates that the tools were deposited in the cave by ancestors, not washed into the site from the outside, the team announced last week.

"There were a number of species of hominids in southern Africa two million years ago," according to a University of Toronto news release. "The most likely candidate as the manufacturer of the stone tools found at Wonderwerk is Homo habilis."

► Read This Entire Post

bat-art-1.jpg

Rock art photos and map courtesy Jack Pettigrew, University of Queensland

Rock art painted in an Australian cave many thousands of years ago depicts flying foxes not found in modern Australia, scientists report in the December issue of the journal Antiquity.

Fossilized remains of a wasp nest overlying the art tested to be 17,500 years old. That suggests that the paintings were made at least that long ago and perhaps even thousands of years before that during the coldest part of the Ice Age, when low sea levels would have made it easier for migration to Australia of either the bats or of the artists who painted them, the researchers said.

► Read This Entire Post
soul-monument-1.jpg

The soul of a royal official in the service of  King Panamuwa of the eighth century B.C. was believed to reside in this carved stone.
Photo by Eudora Struble, University of Chicago

Archaeologists in southeastern Turkey have discovered an Iron Age chiseled stone slab that provides the first written evidence in the region that people believed the soul was separate from the body, University of Chicago researchers announced.

The Neubauer Expedition of the Oriental Institute at the University of Chicago found the 800-pound basalt stele at Zincirli (pronounced "Zin-jeer-lee"), the site of the ancient city of Sam'al.

The inscription reads in part: "I, Kuttamuwa, servant of Panamuwa, am the one who oversaw the production of this stele for myself while still living. I placed it in an eternal chamber(?) and established a feast at this chamber(?): a bull for [the storm-god] Hadad, ... a ram for [the sun-god] Shamash, ... and a ram for my soul that is in this stele."

► Read This Entire Post
Human fire.jpg

Illustration by Roy Andersen/NGS

The ability to make fire was likely a key factor in the migration of prehistoric hominids from Africa into Eurasia, a researcher at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem's Institute of Archaeology reported today.

Excavations at the Gesher Benot Ya'aqov archaeological site in Israel showed that the occupants of the site -- identified as being part of the Acheulian culture that arose in Africa about 1.6 million years ago -- had mastered fire-making ability as long as 790,000 years ago.

► Read This Entire Post
drug-paraphernalia-1.jpg

People who colonized the Caribbean from South America about 1,500 years ago brought with them heirloom drug paraphernalia that had been passed down from generation to generation, anthropologists propose.

Ceramic inhaling bowls found on the island of Carriacou, in the West Indies, date back to between roughly 400 and 100 B.C, according to a study headed by Scott Fitzpatrick, an assistant professor of anthropology at North Carolina State University. These dates are well before the paraphernalia was carried to Carriacou by migrants from South America in about A.D. 400.

Ceramic snuffing tubes and inhaling bowls used for ingesting hallucinogenic substances are known from several islands in the West Indies, but their chronological distribution is often vague, the researchers said.

 

Photo courtesy North Carolina State University

► Read This Entire Post

neanderthal-1.jpg

Reconstruction by Kennis & Kennis/Photo by Joe McNally/NGS

Meet Wilma, the first reconstruction of a Neanderthal created using evidence from fossil anatomy and ancient DNA.

Neanderthals were a species of human that became extinct 28,000 years ago. The lifesize model was created to illustrate "The Last of the Neanderthals," the cover article in the October 2008 issue of National Geographic magazine.

The article, written by Steve Hall and photographed by David Liittschwager and Joe McNally, explores what caused Neanderthals, who dominated Eurasia for more than 200,000 years, to vanish in the Ice Age, while our modern human ancestors survived.

► Read This Entire Post
Neanderthal-one.jpg

Three-dimensional computer-assisted reconstructions of Neanderthal infants based on fossils found in Russia and Syria (left) suggests that our closest human relatives had brains as large as ours at birth and larger than ours as adults.

The finding indicates that we and the Neanderthals inherited the pattern of early brain size and development from a yet unknown common human ancestor, researchers who did the reconstruction say. Still largely unknown is how this pattern of brain development arose during evolution.

The research also sheds light on the similarities and differences in the life histories of modern humans and Neanderthals: the timing of major events in an individual's life, such as gestation time, age at sexual maturity, and age at death. The differences could have given modern humans an evolutionary advantage, the study indicates.

Image courtesy of M. Ponce de León and C. Zollikofer, University of Zurich

► Read This Entire Post

Most Popular Entries