Sign up for free Newsletters

Once a month get new photos and expert tips.

Sign Up

Search Results

Results tagged “hubble” from Breaking Orbit

Hubble's "Savior" Camera Now on Display

Posted on November 19, 2009 | 0 Comments

wfpc2.jpg

Hubble's WFPC-2, now on display at Air and Space
—Picture copyright Smithsonian Institution

"The difference between an artifact and an instrument is that, now that it's an artifact, you can't touch it anymore."

So General Jack Dailey told astronaut John Grunsfeld during the opening of a new gallery in the Smithsonian's National Air and Space Museum—now home to several significant artifacts from the Hubble Space Telescope.

Just a few short months ago, Grunsfeld was part of the shuttle mission sent to repair and upgrade the aging Hubble. The crew's tasks included removing the Wide-Field Planetary Camera 2 (WFPC-2) and the Corrective Optics Space Telescope Axial Replacement (COSTAR) so they could be replaced with more advanced instruments.

(See some of the first pictures from the upgraded Hubble.)

costar.jpg

COSTAR, sometimes called Hubble's contact lenses
—Picture by Eric Long/NASM, copyright Smithsonian Institution

Air and Space made the phone booth-size COSTAR part of its new gallery, called Moving Beyond Earth, a high-tech setup full of interactives, computer feeds, and huge visual projections.

The gallery also houses the HST Power Control Unit Trainer, a life-size replica of Hubble's electrical nerve center. Grunsfeld was among the astronauts who used the trainer to practice replacing the unit during a 2002 servicing mission.

—Picture by Eric Long/NASM, copyright Smithsonian Institution

power-trainer.jpg

WFPC-2, meanwhile, gets a place of honor in the museum's Space Hall. The camera, about the size of a baby grand piano, "turned Hubble into the Great American comeback story," NASA's Edward J. Weiler told reporters during the gallery opening.

The now beloved space telescope had a few early setbacks, including the grim discovery shortly after launch that its primary mirror was deformed, making its science images pretty much useless.

WFPC-2 got installed during the first-ever Hubble servicing mission in December 1993, complete with its own built-in corrective optics that compensated for the faulty mirror.

(FYI, new instruments installed since then also carried their own corrective optics, eventually rendering COSTAR obsolete. It was removed to make room for a device called a spectrograph, designed to study the origins of the universe.)

The same mission added COSTAR, a bundle of tiny mirrors that sent corrected, focused light to the rest of Hubble's instruments. But WFPC-2 specifically went on to provide scientists with some of the most iconic Hubble pictures that both dazzled the public and offered new insights into the universe.

"Museums remind us of the choices we make as a culture." —David DeVorkin

(See WFPC-2's last "pretty picture" before the camera was removed in May 2009.)

"Hubble has more than fulfilled its promise," said senior curator of space history David DeVorkin.

But astronaut Grunsfeld, who joked about his title of "chief Hubble hugger," reminded the audience that it wasn't really the instruments that saved Hubble, it was the people.

"Museums remind us of the choices we make as a culture," DeVorkin added. During Hubble's development, people made the choice to build a space telescope that could see objects ten billion times fainter than the human eye.

People also made the choice to make that telescope something that could be regularly serviced rather than used until it broke and then abandoned.

And when Hubble suffered from its initial setback, people made the choice to find ways to fix what was quickly labeled as a national failure.

"It's a message of persistence," Dailey said. "Don't quit. Hubble is a perfect example of that."

You voted, and [unlike with Stephen Colbert] NASA listened. Now the good folks at Hubble have released this sparkling new image of the interacting galaxy group known as Arp 274:

hubble-winner-arp.jpg

—Image courtesy NASA, ESA, M. Livio and the Hubble Heritage Team (STScI/AURA)

According to NASA, the galactic trio received 67,021 votes out of the nearly 140,000 cast among the six candidate targets.

Previous shots of Arp 274, which sits about 400 million light-years away in the constellation Virgo, showed the object smallish, blurred, and only in shades of gray.

The new image combines data from three kinds of light filters to show the different types of stars within the galaxies in bright color.

Older stars pictured in yellow lie in the central bulges of each galaxy. Globs of younger blue stars line two of the galaxies' spiral arms, while the light from new star formation makes nebulae in the arms glow pink.

hubble-winner-274.png

You voted, and here's your new Hubble superstar: a pair of galaxies that seem to have locked arms in an interstellar dance.

Of the six choices in Hubble's contest, Arp 274 won by a landslide—67,021 votes, as compared to the next runner-up, the spiral galaxy NGC 5172, with 26,987 votes.

Now Hubble scientists are preparing to train the space telescope at their publicly elected target, with the goal of producing a spectacular new image by early April.

So stay tuned for more about this cosmic duo!

Dissecting an Anemic Galaxy

Posted on February 5, 2009 | 0 Comments

The milky swirl seen here is NGC 4921, one of the very few spiral galaxies in the thousand-member Coma galaxy cluster about 320 million light-years away.

hubble-anemic.jpg

—Image courtesy NASA, ESA, K. Cook (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, USA)

The Hubble image, released today, is one of the deepest looks yet at this particular object, revealing a rich amount of new detail about a galaxy we've known of since the 1700s.

In addition to spotting some ghostly dwarf galaxies near the rim, Hubble picks up in sharp detail clusters of bluish dots that show where new stars are forming.

Astronomers consider this galaxy to be anemic, because its rate of star formation is unusually low. [A nice juxtaposition to yesterday's news about a galaxy undergoing a period of hyper-starburst.]

But perhaps the coolest part of this picture is that's actually a glass of proverbial lemonade, made when Hubble handed scientists at Lawrence Livermore National Lab one really big lemon.

Kem Cook and colleagues had been using the space telescope's Advanced Camera for Surveys to search for what are known as Cepheid variable stars, a type of pulsating star that astronomers can use as a standard light source for telling how far away cosmic objects are from Earth.

But in early 2007 the ACS up and broke, leaving Cook's data set incomplete.

Lucky for us, 80 of his images—50 taken with a yellow filter and 30 in near-infrared—could be combined to make the above snazzy snapshot.

Hubble Rocks the Vote

Posted on January 29, 2009 | 0 Comments

Tags:

planetary-nebula.jpg

Planetary nebula NGC 2818. Bask in its glory.
—Image courtesy NASA, ESA, Hubble Heritage Team (STScI / AURA)

Have you ever looked at the latest bit of space glam from the Hubble Space Telescope and thought to yourself: Yeah, that's nice, but I *so* wish they'd snap a few shots of Planetary Nebula NGC 6072, that'd kick it hardcore.

Well, now's your chance to tell NASA what to do.

As part of the ongoing International Year of Astronomy, the folks at Hubble are giving you the opportunity to aim that ginormous telescope at an object of your choice.

The idea is that we'd get new images of something Hubble has never looked at before. The result would be not only purty pictures but some pretty neat science, hopefully.

Of course, the best we have to go on right now are blurry, grainy, and in some cases overexposed pictures of objects that we don't know a lot about. That's the point, but it also makes it hard to know what the best target would be, scientifically speaking.

They've narrowed the options down to six candidates based on the brightest things the 'scope would be able to see in the given observation window.

Over at Hubblesite, you can check out low-res sky survey images of your choices—a star-forming nebula, two planetary nebulae, and three different takes on galaxies.

For some help deciding, the site also has a brief video of Dr. Frank Summers, Hubble astronomer, walking you through the candidates' qualifications.

Nominations are due by March 1, and the Hubble shot of the winning object will be released in April. So get out there and vote, kiddies!

Hubble Repairs Hit the Brakes

Posted on October 17, 2008 | 0 Comments

Oops, Hubble did it again.

As the media touting Hubble's revival late last night, NASA engineers ran smack into Murphy's Law: A pair of seemingly unrelated glitches snarled efforts to fix the science data formatter, the bit on the space telescope that sends its collected information back to Earth.

The primary formatter had failed on September 27, so engineers had sent Hubble into safe mode to remotely switch to an onboard backup system.

It was smooth sailing until yesterday afternoon, when something snagged during calibration of two of the science instruments that feed data into the formatter.

"We experienced an issue late yesterday on Hubble that we're still troubleshooting," Goddard spokesperson Ed Campion told National Geographic News this morning.

"We've stopped trying to activate science."

NatGeo News reporter Anne Minard was right on top of the action—you can read her breaking report on the events posted this morning, as well as a more detailed followup based on an afternoon press conference.

No doubt the flurry of drama will revive concerns about the cost and effort of maintaining Hubble. It's an 18-year-old piece of equipment, after all, and it relies on human intervention via the also aging and highly controversial shuttle program to keep everything operational.

pillars-creation.jpg

One of Hubble's most famous images, the "pillars of creation" in the Eagle nebula
—Photograph courtesy NASA, ESA, STScI, J. Hester and P. Scowen (Arizona State University)

But Hubble's successor, the James Webb Space Telescope, isn't due for launch until 2013, leaving quite a gap in data collection if we let the old boy go.

With the U.S. in the grip of an escalating financial crisis, will the public balk at the millions of dollars it will take to get Hubble once again up to its fullest potential? Or will the telescope's reputation for eye-popping visuals keep it afloat no matter the cost?

America, how much is Hubble worth to you?

The tug-of-war between space-based and ground-based telescopes continues, with today's release of what's being called the sharpest full-planet image of Jupiter taken by an on-the-ground observatory.

jupiter-sharpest.jpg

—Image courtesy ESO

[versus]

jupiter-hubble.jpg

Jupiter, as seen by the Hubble Space Telescope in 2007
—Image courtesy NASA, ESA, and the Hubble Heritage Team (AURA/STScI)

An international team used the ESO's Very Large Telescope in Chile to stare right at Jupiter for almost two hours straight.

The resulting infrared image revealed that Jupiter has lowered its belt. The bulk of the haze within the bight band around Jupiter's midsection has migrated south by more than 3,700 miles (6,000 kilometers) since 2005, the researchers said.

"The change we see in the haze could be related to big changes in cloud patterns associated with last year's planet-wide upheaval, but we need to look at more data to narrow down precisely when the changes occurred," team member Mike Wong said in a press release.

[Incidentally, the global upheaval he's referring to involved massive changes in cloud patterns and other wild weather features observed in 2007.]

In an interview with NatGeo News reporter Richard A. Lovett, lead researcher Franck Marchis, a planetary astronomer at the University of California, Berkeley, and the SETI Institute, said of the new image: "We have something comparable to or even better than the Hubble Space Telescope."

Wow. But this isn't the first time researchers using ground-based 'scopes have compared their work to products of the aging but much beloved Hubble.

► Read This Entire Post

Sometimes it must seem like the Hubble Space Telescope is a time traveler.

Within hours of Hubble making headlines because it shut itself down due to a serious mechanical failure, mission scientists released a survey of galactic diversity based on new Hubble images.

hubble1.jpg

NGC 253, Sculptor Group galaxy, 13 million light-years away
—Image courtesy NASA, ESA, J. Dalcanton and B. Williams (University of Washington)

Using two of its powerful cameras, Hubble captured high-resolution views of 69 galaxies that lie 6.5 million to 13 million light-years away. This sounds pretty distant, but it's actually right in our cosmic backyard.

The project—delightfully named the ACS Nearby Galaxy Survey Treasury, or ANGST, program—aims to use the new, detailed views of old stars in nearby galaxies like a fossil record.

More distant galaxies are younger galaxies to Earth-based observers, because the light had to travel for millions of years to reach us, so what we see now is how a galaxy looked in it's early days.

The young/far galaxies are loaded with active star formation and are good models in general for figuring out how galaxies grow up.

hubble2.jpg

NGC 300, Sculptor Group galaxy, 7 million light-years away

—Image courtesy NASA, ESA, J. Dalcanton and B. Williams (University of Washington)


By comparing the closer, geriatric galaxies to their younger cousins, scientists hope to trace how various types of galaxies might have evolved, as well as possibly getting a clearer picture of stellar life cycles. [Yes, I know I'm supposed to be talking about planets here, but you gotta have stars for planets to form, right?]

But, you might ask, NASA says Hubble is broken, so how is it still releasing new images?

► Read This Entire Post

About This Blog

The moon
From dwarf planets to hot Jupiters, join NatGeo News space and tech editor Victoria Jaggard in a global discussion about all things extraterrestrial.


news.nationalgeographic.com

Share This

Add to Technorati Favorites
 

Subscribe to This Blog

Get the RSS feed for this blog—and don't miss a single word.

RSS     What is RSS?

Blogroll